🔗 Share this article

Are your professional networking followers viewing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of respondents applauding your insights on expanding your business? Are headhunters making contact to explore opportunities?

If not, the explanation might be that you're not male.

The Test: Changing Gender Identity for Increased Reach

Dozens of female professionals participated in a collective professional network test recently after popular discussions indicated that switching their gender to "man" enhanced their network presence.

Some participants modified their profiles to incorporate what they termed "masculine-oriented" language - adding results-driven business buzzwords like "drive", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their exposure also improved.

Systemic Preference Questions Raised

The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether a built-in gender bias in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes men who employ professional networking terminology.

Like most major networking sites, LinkedIn employs a computerized system to decide which content appear to which members - promoting some while reducing others.

Company Statement

Through a blog post, LinkedIn recognized the phenomenon but stated it does not consider "personal characteristics" when deciding content distribution. Instead, the company mentioned that "numerous factors" influence how content are received.

Changing gender in your settings does not affect how your content shows up in search or feed.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who modified her gender identifiers to "male pronouns" and her name to "Simon E", reported extraordinary results.

"The statistics I'm observing indicate a 1,600% increase in profile views and a 1,300% increase in content views," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, started testing after observing her audience decrease significantly.

The Process

• Initially, she modified her profile gender to "man"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rewrite her professional summary using "male-coded" wording
• Lastly, she recycled old posts with similar "agentic" style

The result was immediate: a 415% increase in visibility within seven days.

The Downside

Although the positive results, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the approach.

"Previously, my content were softer - brief and insightful, but also warm and human," she stated. "Now, the bro-coded version was forceful and confident - similar to a white male being overly confident."

She abandoned the test after one week, saying "Every day I continued, and outcomes improved, I became more frustrated."

Mixed Results

Some participants experienced favorable results. Cass Cooper who changed both her profile gender to "male" and her ethnicity to "Caucasian" reported a decrease in visibility and engagement.

"We know there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to understand how it operates in particular situations or the reasons behind it," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These tests occur alongside continuing conversations about LinkedIn's distinctive role as both a business platform and community site.

Platform modifications in the past few months have reportedly caused female creators experiencing significantly reduced exposure, leading to unofficial tests where identical content by men and women received dramatically unequal audience engagement.

Technical Explanation

According to LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to categorize and distribute content based on various elements, including post content and the member's career profile.

The company states it frequently assesses its systems, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

Company representative proposed that recent declines in some users' reach might stem from higher volume due to more content on the platform.

Evolving Environment

As one participant noted, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she remarked. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly competitive and less controlled."